Placement effects correction in raster pattern generator

ABSTRACT

A method for generating a flash. The method includes computing a displacement vector to resist charging. The displacement vector is defined as {right arrow over (δ)} c =dP{circle around (x)}{right arrow over (K)}, where {right arrow over (δ)} c represents the displacement vector, d represents dose correction multipliers, P represents a pattern and {right arrow over (K)} represents a Poisson kernel converted to a spatial domain. The method further includes using the displacement vector to modify the positioning of the flash.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to pattern generation systems and methods used by such systems to form patterns on substrates, and more particularly, to an electron beam pattern generation system.

2. Description of the Related Art

Any effect on the exposure of a point in an imaged pattern by the exposure of any neighboring point may be called a proximity effect. For example, limited resolution of the electron optical exposure or inherent resist resolution, electron scattering in the resist layer and electron backscattering from the substrate on which the resist layer lies may cause a blurring of the exposure dose distribution delivered to a specific point. As a result, a portion of the exposure dose designed to be delivered to a specific point is in fact delivered to neighboring points. In addition, exposure of the resist layer at a specific point may result in localized heating of the resist that can diffuse outward to neighboring points. The result is modified resist sensitivity at those neighboring, proximate points. These effects may also be referred to as critical dimension effects.

Thermal expansion of the substrate on which the resist is formed is another localized heating effect that may result in feature placement errors at neighboring points through non-uniform thermal expansion of the substrate. These thermal expansion errors may also be referred to as placement effects.

In addition, during exposure by a charged particle beam, the resist may acquire a local charge. This charge may deflect the incoming particle beam, leading to pattern placement errors.

These proximity effects may result in an exposure dose error, real or effective, at specific points. Critical dimension effects and placement effects may cause real exposure dose errors by altering the location of the point where an electron influences the resist. Resist heating may result in an effective exposure dose error by altering the sensitivity of the resist to electrons.

Where critical dimension effects depend only on the total exposure dose delivered to neighboring sites, resist heating effects and placement effects may also be influenced by the rate and time sequence of exposure dose delivery. Thus, by a variety of mechanisms, proximity effects may result in unwanted variations in the size, shape and or location of lithographic features.

The correction of these errors is an important aspect of electron beam lithography, particularly in view of the trend to smaller geometries with increasingly complex patterns requiring greater precision and accuracy. A need, therefore, exists in the art for an improved method for minimizing, if not eliminating, critical dimension effects and placement effects in connection with generating a flash.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the invention are generally directed to a method for generating a flash. The method includes computing a displacement vector to resist charging. The displacement vector is defined as {right arrow over (δ)}_(c)=dP{circle around (x)}{right arrow over (K)}, where {right arrow over (δ)}_(c)represents the displacement vector, d represents dose correction multipliers, P represents a pattern and {right arrow over (K)} represents a Poisson kernel converted to a spatial domain. The method further includes using the displacement vector to modify the positioning of the flash.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.

FIG. 1 illustrates a simplified representation of a raster scan writing strategy.

FIG. 2 is a method for printing a pattern in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 3 illustrates a flow diagram of a method for computing the fogging scattering portion of the dose correction multipliers in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram of a method for computing dose correction multipliers in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of a method for generating a flash in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The run-time proximity corrections disclosed herein employ a raster scan writing strategy and a rasterized pattern data representation in an electron beam pattern generating system. FIG. 1 illustrates a simplified representation of a raster scan writing strategy. One or more electron beams 110 are scanned periodically 120 in a first direction, while stage motion 130 in a second, orthogonal direction provides for exposure of each pixel 140. Each time, beam 110 is scanned in the first direction exposing one or more rows of pixels 140. To support this writing strategy, data is organized as a regular array of exposure data. Pixels are typically in the range of approximately 0.05 to 0.2 μm in diameter to write features having a size in the range of approximately 0.05 to 2.0 μm. Exposure data for each pixel 140 consists of one exposure level P_(ij), where i and j are indices for grid 150.

Critical dimension or proximity effects discussed herein include fogging scattering effects, backscattering effects, fast secondary scattering effects and relative resist sensitivity. The various scattering effects are at varying length scales, i.e., the fogging scattering is at about 10 mm, the backscattering is at about 10 μm and the fast secondary scattering is at about 100 nm to about 1000 nm. As such, the various scattering effects range over five orders of magnitude, i.e., from about 100 nm to about 10 mm. Relative resist sensitivity will be described in the paragraphs below.

Corrections of these various critical dimension effects may involve calculations to determine what dose modification, if any, will be applied to each pixel during writing. Some calculations may involve convolving various functions with one another to result in run-time corrections in the manner described in the following paragraphs. Some calculations may use convolution kernels to generate corrections. Embodiments of the invention may be implemented in a rasterizer (not shown). Critical dimension effects using embodiments of the invention may be corrected at run time or at data preparation.

FIG. 2 is a method 200 for printing a pattern in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. At step 210, the fogging scattering portion of the dose correction multipliers are computed. In one embodiment, the fogging scattering portion of the dose correction multipliers are computed prior to printing.

FIG. 3 illustrates a flow diagram of a method 300 for computing the fogging scattering portion of the dose correction multipliers in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. At step 310, the pattern is sampled to grids suitable for the various critical dimension scattering effects. As an example, for the fogging scattering effects, the pattern may be sampled to a grid having a cell size of about 1 mm. For the backscattering effects, the pattern may be sampled to a grid having a cell size of about 1 μm. For the fast secondary effects, the pattern may be sampled to a grid having a cell size of about 50 to about 200 nm. In one embodiment, the pattern may be quasi-random sampled. In another embodiment, the sample may be about 1% to about 10% of the pattern.

At step 320, the dose correction multipliers are initialized to 1. At step 330, the dose correction multipliers are compressed to the grid suitable for the fogging scattering effects, which has the same size as the grid described in step 310. Likewise, at step 340, the dose correction multipliers are compressed to the grid suitable for the backscattering effects, which has the same size as the grid described in step 310. Likewise, at step 345, the dose correction multipliers are compressed to the grid suitable for the fast secondary scattering effects, which has the same size as the grid described in step 310. In this manner, the dose correction multipliers and the pattern samples are at the same grid size.

At step 350, the compressed dose correction multipliers and the pattern sample for the fogging scattering effects are multiplied point by point and convolved with X_(f) to generate the fogging scattering portion (or term) of the compressed dose correction multipliers. X_(f) is defined as ${X_{f} = {\sum\limits^{fogging}\quad{a_{i}{G\left( \sigma_{i} \right)}}}},$ where a_(i)represents weights of respective Gaussians G of widths σ_(i). X_(f) is thus that portion of the electron scattering point spread function due to fogging. The fogging scattering portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers is calculated over the entire mask. At step 360, the fogging scattering portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers is expanded to a common scale grid. In one embodiment, the common scale grid has a cell size of about 50 to about 200 nm. The expansion operation is performed using an interpolation algorithm, such as linear interpolation, quadratic interpolation or any other interpolation algorithm commonly known by persons of ordinary skill in the art.

At step 370, the compressed dose correction multipliers and the pattern sample for the backscattering effects are multiplied point by point and convolved with X_(b) to generate the backscattering portion (or term) of the compressed dose correction multipliers. X_(b) is defined as $X_{b} = {\sum\limits^{backscatter}\quad{a_{i}{{G\left( \sigma_{i} \right)}.}}}$ The backscattering portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers is also calculated over the entire mask. At step 380, the backscattering portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers is expanded to a common scale grid. In one embodiment, the common scale grid has a cell size of about 50 to about 200 nm. The expansion operation may be performed using an interpolation algorithm, such as linear interpolation, quadratic interpolation or any other interpolation algorithm commonly known by persons of ordinary skill in the art.

At step 390, the dose correction multipliers and the pattern sample for the fast secondary scattering effects are multiplied point by point and convolved with X_(s) to generate the fast secondary scattering portion (or term) of the compressed dose correction multipliers. X_(s) is defined as $X_{s} = {\sum\limits^{{fast} - {secondary}}\quad{a_{i}{{G\left( \sigma_{i} \right)}.}}}$ In one embodiment, the fast secondary scattering portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers is calculated over a sample of the mask. At step 385, the fast secondary scattering portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers is expanded to a common scale grid. The expansion operation may be performed using an interpolation algorithm, such as linear interpolation, quadratic interpolation or any other interpolation algorithm commonly known by persons of ordinary skill in the art.

At step 395, the entire dose correction multipliers are computed according to the following equation: d′=Ad/Θ{A _(k) d+2(d _(s) P _(s) {circle around (x)}X _(s))+2(d _(b) P _(b) {circle around (x)}X _(b))+2(d _(f) P _(f) {circle around (x)}X _(f))}  (Equation 1), where A represents the sum of all coefficients in the Gaussian representation of the point spread function, d represents the dose correction multipliers, A_(k) represents the weight of that proportion of the energy deposition that does not scatter by fast secondary, backscatter, or fogging effects, d_(s)P_(s){circle around (x)}X_(s) represents the fast secondary scattering portion of the dose correction multipliers computed at step 385-390, d_(b)P_(b){circle around (x)}X_(b) represents the backscattering portion of the dose correction multipliers computed at steps 370-380, d_(f)P_(f{circle around (x)}X) _(f) represents the fogging scattering portion of the dose correction multipliers computed at steps 350-360 and {circumflex over (−)} represents correction for relative resist sensitivity, which will be described in the paragraphs below.

Steps 330 through 395 are then repeated until the dose correction multipliers computed at step 395 converge. Step 325 illustrates that processing is repeated for the next iteration. As such, i represents an iteration index for the dose correction multipliers.

At the point of convergence, at step 396, the fogging scattering portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers computed at step 350 is saved or frozen for future use during the printing phase, which will be described with reference to FIG. 4. Steps 330 through 395 may be repeated or iterated about 3 or 4 times. In one embodiment, at step 396, the fogging scattering portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers that has been expanded to a common scale grid at step 360 is saved or frozen, rather than the fogging scattering portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers computed at step 350.

Referring back to FIG. 2, at step 220, the frozen fogging portion of the dose correction multipliers is used to compute the rest of the dose correction multipliers. FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram of a method 400 for computing dose correction multipliers in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. At step 410, the pattern is compressed to grids configured to take into account the backscattering effects and the fast secondary scattering effects. At step 420, the dose correction multipliers are compressed to a grid configured for the backscattering effects. At step 425, the dose correction multipliers are compressed to a grid configured for the fast secondary scattering effects.

At step 430, the saved or frozen fogging portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers is expanded using to a common scale grid. In one embodiment, the common scale grid has a cell size of about 50 to about 200 nm. The expansion operation may be performed using an interpolation algorithm, such as linear interpolation, quadratic interpolation or any other interpolation algorithm commonly known by persons of ordinary skill in the art.

At step 440, the compressed dose correction multipliers and the pattern configured for the backscattering effects are multiplied point by point and convolved with X_(b) to generate the backscattering portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers. At step 450, the backscattering portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers is expanded to a common scale grid. In one embodiment, the common scale grid has a cell size of about 50 to about 200 nm. The expansion operation may be performed using an interpolation algorithm, such as linear interpolation, quadratic interpolation or any other interpolation algorithm commonly known by persons of ordinary skill in the art.

At step 460, the compressed dose correction multipliers and the pattern configured for the fast secondary scattering effects are multiplied point by point and convolved with X_(s) to generate the fast secondary scattering portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers. At step 455, the fast secondary scattering portion of the compressed dose correction multipliers is expanded to a common scale grid. The expansion operation may be performed using an interpolation algorithm, such as linear interpolation, quadratic interpolation or any other interpolation algorithm commonly known by persons of ordinary skill in the art.

At step 470, the entire dose correction multipliers are computed according to Equation (1). Steps 420 through 470 are then repeated or iterated until the dose correction multipliers computed at step 470 converge. Upon convergence, the dose correction multipliers at the last iteration are sent to the flash generator (step 480). Referring back to FIG. 2, at step 230, the final dose correction multipliers are then used to modify a dose for generating a flash. In this manner, the final dose correction multipliers may be used to modulate the flash dwell time.

As mentioned above, Equation (1) contains the variable {circumflex over (−)}, which represents relative resist sensitivity, which may vary across the mask. Several factors contributing to variation in relative resist sensitivity include resist heating, map-type effects and time-dependent effects. Relative resist sensitivity may be represented as Θ=Θ_(h)×Θ_(m)×Θ_(t), where Θ_(h) represents correction for resist heating, Θ_(m) represents correction for map-type effects, and Θ_(t)represents correction for time-dependent effects. Θ is a spatially varying quantity, which enters Equation (1) point-wise.

Resist sensitivity varies with temperature. Accordingly, correction for resist heating may be defined as a function of temperature, i.e., Θ_(h)=Θ_(h)(T), where T represents temperature, which is a function of the writing history. If the flash-to-flash heating is ignored and only line-to-line heating is considered, T may be determined by T=dP{circle around (x)}Γ, where Γ where is the thermal diffusion kernel converted to the spatial domain and may be a function of substrate material and stage speed. Correction for resist heating may also be a function of resist type and resist thickness, and as such, it may be determined experimentally, which may require tabular input.

Map-type effects may arise from non-uniformities in resist coating, resist development, and absorber etching. As such, correction for map-type effects is a function of space (X, Y), i.e., Θ_(m)=θ_(m)(X,Y). Correction for map-type effects may also be a function of process recipe, e.g., resist type, post exposure tool, etch tool and the like, and as such may be determined experimentally, which may require tabular input.

Correction for time-dependent effects may be defined as a function of time elapsed between the exposure of a flash and the post-exposure bake, at which time the resist chemistry is quenched. That is Θ_(t)=Θ_(t)(t_(PEB)−t), where t_(PEB) represents the post-exposure bake time and t represents the flash exposure time. In the simplest model, the post-exposure bake time is unknown. Thus, {circumflex over (−)}_(t) may be approximated by a simple, linear function, Θ_(t)≈Θ_(t)′(t′), where t′ represents the time elapsed since the first flash was exposed on the plate.

In this manner, any critical dimension effects that are dose-dependent may be corrected by modulating the dose according to the various embodiments described herein. As each flash is printed, a dose unique to that flash is selected to offset the critical dimension effects associated with that dose. By using embodiments of the invention, the impact of critical dimension effects on each flash may be predicted in advance and used to modify the dose accordingly.

Embodiments of the invention are also directed to correcting placement effects on flash generation. Placement effects include effects that move a beam impact point relative to the mask surface, e.g., global resist charging. FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of a method 500 for generating a flash in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. At step 510, a displacement vector is computed according to {right arrow over (δ)}_(c)=dP{circle around (x)}{right arrow over (K)}, where {right arrow over (δ)}_(c) represents the displacement vector due to the resist charging, d represents the dose correction multipliers, P represents the pattern and {right arrow over (K)} is a vector quantity that represents Poisson kernel converted to the spatial domain. The Poisson kernel may be a function of machine geometry, writing speed, resist material and resist thickness. As such, the Poisson kernel may contain a proportionality constant that is a function of machine geometry, which may be determined experimentally, but is fixed for the machine. Further, a decay constant (resistance) in the Poisson kernel may be determined experimentally for each resist and thickness. The decay, which is time dependent, may result in an asymmetric kernel. In one embodiment, the displacement vector may be computed at run time. In another embodiment, the displacement vector may be computed in the rasterizer since it has the information regarding the pattern during printing.

At step 520, the displacement vector is used to modify the positioning of the flash. In one embodiment, the flash may be displaced in an opposite direction of the displacement vector. The displacement vector may be applied to flash microvectors.

While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow. 

1. A method for generating a flash, comprising: computing a displacement vector to resist charging, wherein the displacement vector is defined as {right arrow over (δ)}_(c)=dP{circle around (x)}{right arrow over (K)}, where {right arrow over (δ)}_(c) represents the displacement vector, d represents dose correction multipliers, P represents a pattern and {right arrow over (K)} represents a Poisson kernel converted to a spatial domain; and using the displacement vector to modify the positioning of the flash.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein using the displacement vector to modify the positioning of the flash comprises displacing the flash in an opposite direction of the displacement vector.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein displacement vector is computed at run time.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the Poisson kernel comprises a decay constant.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the dose correction multipliers take into account fogging scattering effects, backscattering effects and fast secondary scattering effects.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the dose correction multipliers are computed by first computing a fogging scattering portion of the dose correction multipliers.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein computing the fogging scattering portion comprises sampling a pattern to a first grid configured to take into account the fogging scattering effects, to a second grid configured to take into account the backscattering effects and to a third grid configured to take into account the fast secondary scattering effects.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein computing the fogging scattering portion further comprises: (a) compressing the dose correction multipliers to the first grid, the second grid and the third grid; (b) generating a compressed fogging scattering portion by multiplying the dose correction multipliers compressed to the first grid with the pattern sampled to the first grid and convolving the result with X_(f) defined as ${X_{f} = {\sum\limits^{fogging}\quad{a_{i}{G\left( \sigma_{i} \right)}}}},$ where G represents Gaussian functions, a_(i) represents weights of respective Gaussian functions, and σ_(i) represents widths of the Gaussian functions; (c) expanding the compressed fogging scattering portion to generate the fogging scattering portion; (d) generating a compressed backscattering portion by multiplying the dose correction multipliers compressed to the second grid with the pattern sampled to the second grid and convolving the result with X_(b) defined as ${X_{b} = {\sum\limits^{backscatter}\quad{a_{i}{G\left( \sigma_{i} \right)}}}};$ (e) expanding the compressed backscattering portion to generate the backscattering portion; (f) generating a compressed fast secondary scattering portion by multiplying the dose correction multipliers compressed to the third grid with the pattern sampled to the third grid and convolving the result with X_(s) defined as ${X_{s} = {\sum\limits^{{fast} - {secondary}}\quad{a_{i}{G\left( \sigma_{i} \right)}}}};$ (g) expanding the compressed fast secondary scattering portion to generate the fast secondary scattering portion; and (h) computing the dose correction multipliers according to d′=Ad/Θ{A_(k)d+2(d_(s)P_(s){circle around (x)}X_(s))+2(d_(b)P_(b){circle around (x)}X_(b))+2(d_(f)P_(f){circle around (x)}X_(f))}, where A represents a sum of all coefficients in the Gaussian representation of the point spread function, d represents the dose correction multipliers, A_(k) represents the weight of a proportion of energy deposition that does not scatter by fast secondary, backscatter, or fogging effects, d_(s)P_(s){circle around (x)}X_(s) represents the fast secondary scattering portion, d_(b)P_(b){circle around (x)}X_(b) represents the backscattering portion, d_(f)P_(f){circle around (x)}X_(f) represents the fogging scattering portion and {circle around (-)} represents correction for resist sensitivity.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein steps (a) through (h) are iterated until changes in the dose correction multipliers converge to a predetermined value.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the compressed fogging scattering portion used to compute the last dose correction multipliers is saved at the point of convergence.
 11. The method of claim 8, wherein expanding the compressed fogging scattering portion comprises expanding the compressed fogging scattering portion to a common scale grid.
 12. The method of claim 8, wherein the compressed fogging scattering portion is expanded using an interpolation algorithm.
 13. The method of claim 8, wherein expanding the compressed backscattering portion comprises expanding the compressed backscattering portion to a common scale grid.
 14. The method of claim 8, wherein the compressed backscattering portion is expanded using an interpolation algorithm.
 15. The method of claim 8, wherein the correction for resist sensitivity comprises at least one of correction for resist heating, correction for map-type defects and correction for time-dependent defects.
 16. The method of claim 8, wherein computing the dose correction multipliers comprises compressing the pattern to the second grid and to the third grid.
 17. The method of claim 8, wherein computing the dose correction multipliers further comprises: (i) compressing the dose correction multipliers to the second grid and the third grid; (j) expanding the saved compressed fogging scattering portion to generate the fogging scattering portion; (k) generating a compressed backscattering portion by multiplying the dose correction multipliers compressed to the second grid with the pattern compressed to the second grid and convolving the result with X_(b) defined as, ${X_{b} = {\sum\limits^{backscatter}\quad{a_{i}{G\left( \sigma_{i} \right)}}}};$ (l) expanding compressed backscattering portion to generate the backscattering portion; (m) generating a compressed fast secondary scattering portion by multiplying the dose correction multipliers compressed to the third grid with the pattern compressed to the third grid and convolving the result with X_(s) defined as ${X_{s} = {\sum\limits^{{fast} - {secondary}}\quad{a_{i}{G\left( \sigma_{i} \right)}}}};$ (n) expanding the compressed fast secondary scattering portion to generate the fast secondary scattering portion; and (o) computing the dose correction multipliers according to d′=Ad/Θ{A_(k)d+2(d_(s)P_(s){circle around (x)}X_(s))+2(d_(b)P_(b){circle around (x)}X_(b))+2(d_(f)P_(f){circle around (x)}X_(f))}.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein steps (i) through (o) are iterated until changes in the dose correction multipliers converge to a predetermined value.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the dose correction multipliers at the last iteration is used to generate the flash.
 20. The method of claim 18, using the dose correction multipliers to generate the flash comprises sending the dose correction multipliers at the last iteration to a flash generator.
 21. The method of claim 18, wherein the dose correction multipliers at the last iteration is used to modulate the flash dwell time. 